Fear of Failure?
- Bryan Van Itallie
- 3 days ago
- 1 min read
High standards don’t have to create fear.
In the U.S. Nuclear Submarine Fleet, we were trained to assume any failure was preventable if we treated the task with enough seriousness and attention to detail.
That mindset makes sense when the stakes are nuclear.
But it can create a fear of mistakes
And fear shuts down learning.
Bad news travels slowly, and rework gets expensive.
What helped us counter that wasn’t lower standards.
It was a better learning loop.
When something went wrong, we ran a rigorous. blameless postmortem:
➡️ Facts: what happened?
➡️ Contributors: what conditions made it likely?
➡️ Countermeasures: what will we change so it doesn’t repeat?
Blameless doesn’t mean accountability-free.
It means we stop confusing blame with improvement.
Some mistakes are preventable; some failures are the cost of learning.
On a boat, you don’t wait for the casualty, you train to catch weak signals early.

Business isn’t a submarine, but the principle holds:
👉 If you want curiosity and innovation, you need a repeatable way to turn mistakes into better systems.
How have you made it safer to report bad news?




Comments